The Senate debate on ethics turned in to a battle over earmarks reform yesterday.  In the end, the Senate adopted an amendment offered by Senator DeMint (R-SC) that mirrored the House-passed language.  The Democratic leadership, however, opposed DeMint's amendment -- but their objection, through a motion to table DeMint's amendment, was defeated:

Last week the House Democrats passed an unexpectedly broad change to their chamber’s rules that would disclose the size, purpose and sponsor of any earmark.

But on Thursday, when Senator Jim DeMint, Republican of South Carolina, introduced the same thing in the Senate, Democratic leaders moved quickly to squash it, calling the House bill ill thought out.

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, said he was happy to see the House “moving things along very quickly.” But, Mr. Reid said, “frankly, I don’t think they spent the time on this that we have.”

The Democratic leaders’ effort to block the DeMint proposal was defeated by a vote of 51 to 46, surprising almost everyone in the Senate. The outcome reflected the keen desire of many lawmakers to appear to be on the side of openness and reform after an election that turned in part on Congressional corruption scandals.

The roll call vote is below and can be found here.  A "Nay" vote was a vote against the motion to table and would keep the amendment alive.

Alphabetical by Senator Name