Send to Friend

FromTo


Blog Entry from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington

CREW: Palin Administration not so open or transparent after all -- mirrors Bush administration's approach to transparency.

Today, CREW released a fact sheet, PALIN ADMINISTRATION NOT SO OPEN OR TRANSPARENT AFTER ALL.  We're posting the full document below and the accompanying documents can be found here.   It's striking how closely the Palin administration follows the Bush administration's approach to transparency.  

PALIN ADMINISTRATION NOT SO OPEN OR TRANSPARENT AFTER ALL

Governor Sarah Palin campaigned in 2006 on the promise to “open the door wide to transparent and accountable government.”

FACTS

The Alaska Attorney General issued an opinion on August 21, 2008 concluding that state employees have a right to privacy while using state-issued communication equipment shortly after it was revealed that Governor Palin and her staff used their state-issued blackberrys and computers for communications related to Governor Palin’s efforts to have her former brother-in-law, Alaska State Trooper Mike Wooten, fired. [read Alaska AG opinion here]

This is a radical departure from Alaska’s previous position that employees have no expectation of privacy in government email. [read AK State Policy Regarding Personal Use of State Office Technologies here]

When confronted with Governor Palin’s abandonment of her promise to have an open and transparent government, her communication director claimed that commitment related only to “the stranded gas act versus the AGIA concept under Governor Palin.” (A gas pipeline development issue) [listen to communications director Bill McAllister on the Palin administration’s view of transparency here]

A review of the State of Alaska’s website, however, reveals that the phrase “open and transparent” is used repeatedly in regard to a wide variety of government initiatives

BUSH ADMINISTRATION COMPARISON

Governor Palin mirrors the Bush administration’s approach to transparency.

About CREW

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington uses high-impact legal actions to target government officials who sacrifice the common good to special interests. Receive email updates:
Optional Member Code

Ethics in the News